Maryland Indecent Exposure Law Criminal Defense Lawyer Howard

INDECENT EXPOSURE – MARYLAND LAWYERS

Maryland Criminal Defense

A person in Maryland who intentionally and deliberately exposes a portion or portions of his/her private body parts, i.e. their genitalia, in an environment where such an exposure is likely to be considered a violation of the prevalent standards of decency may be charged with indecent exposure. In Maryland, an act of indecent exposure to a minor is charged as a felony.

Maryland Indecent Exposure Law Criminal Defense Lawyer Howard
Maryland Indecent Exposure Law Criminal Defense Lawyer Howard

Generally, to be charged with indecent exposure, the law requires the indecent exposure to happen in a public place. However, a person can be on private property such as their deck or porch and if they expose a portion or portions of their body that is considered indecent, they may still be charged with indecent exposure. Some of the different types of acts that can result in indecent exposure charges are masturbation, or exhibitionism in a public place.

Please contact the Law Offices of SRIS, P.C. if you have been charged with sexual intercourseindecent exposure in Maryland.

The Law Offices of SRIS, P.C. has client meeting locations in Maryland to better serve you:  Rockville, MD. (Montgomery County) & Baltimore, MD.

We also represent clients charged with indecent exposure in the federal courts of Maryland.

Our attorneys and staff in Maryland, speak the following languages in addition to English: Tamil, Spanish, French, Arabic, Hindi, Malaysian, Cantonese, Mandarin, and Telugu.

For more information, or to make an appointment with a SRIS, P.C. attorney in Maryland call us at 888-437-7747.

Courts we cover in Howard, Maryland

Howard County Circuit Court

8360 Court Avenue,
Ellicott City, MD 21043.

Howard County District Court

3451 Courthouse Drive,
Ellicott City, MD 21043-4377.

Article written by A Sris
Click to Chat

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.